Case: Carte d'Or

“Does it pay to focus on sponsoring on television?”
To pre- and
post test TV ads is a matter of course. But how much do we know today about the
effects of sponsorships? A study that Zapera did recently sheds light on the effect.
When GB Ice Cream decided to sponsor the Friday night movie on Swedish TV3 during
the fall of 2006 with its premium brand Carte d’Or. The question was how effective
sponsoring really is compared to regular TV-ads, Louise Eriksson tells, CMI (Consumer
and Market Insight) Manager Nordic at GB Ice Cream. What effect does the short exposure
of a simple message have?
Zapera got the job to measure the effect. Before the sponsoring began a null measure
was made in September 2006 of knowledge, attitude and buying interest for Carte
d’Or. When the campaign had ended there was a follow up in January 2007 with a post
measure, where the same variables were tested within the target group, women and
men 20 – 50 years old.
Carte d’Or was presented as sponsor from week 36 to 52 with billboards and a 10
seconds break movie. It appeared that the knowledge had really increased, Louise
tells. The goal was to strengthen Carte d’Or as a premium brand, which means showing
that Carte d’Or has a little more to offer than other ice cream brands. In the post
measure it was clear that Carte d’Or had strengthened its position as a premium
brand, she continues.
We also clearly saw that the Friday movies on TV3 reach different people since some
movies attract guys and others girls. Therefore the covering was wider than if we
had put our stakes on a TV show that the viewers faithfully follow one time after
another, Louise says.
To be honest you should consider that the entire effect does not necessarily come
from the sponsorship. We have actually improved the packaging design. Additionally
we had a lot of focus on the stores where we had a series of activities.
The total effect was a massive increase in the sales numbers. We will continue our
focus on sponsoring, Louise sums up.
Source: Zapera News, Issue 26, April 2007